We have finally access to ALL human information and art possible.
 However we still don’t regain  access to our own brains...

in order to relate these informations to each other, build concepts and relate it to reality.

And for the perception of reality is still important to regain access to our perception through a very thoughtful, imaginative art, capable of emote and open our hearts to what actually is there, not in us.

Every human treasure, fruits of genious and hard work is there,
but to be stupid still rules.

What matters is if you love out of lack or abundance.

Even a character has a TRUE rolle to play.

Love, Porn and Self-Improviment

The best part of being a self-improving person is that you are more likely to be a good seducer - at least if you don’t choose celibate; and after you are a good seducer, namely by  ways in wich you can overcome yourself , you don’t  have important  erotical problems: you just fell pathetic and unchallenged while depending on porn and its unavoidable  accidental encounters with the bestial world.

  Aesthetical representations of the sensual conditions of love  are not the problem, but how it reflects more and more civilizational sickness and hostile disconnection of genders is. 

Check the statistics, and principaly the pornsites ( not the only the pleasend and softy surface, but their contradiction with the world of laws, or even with the same thing that supports them!) then you can see that massive amount people are searching for self-degradation while postponing self-improviment.

 If people take  seriously this unspoken issue, than we can finally talk about erotic ( beauty and sex) and therefore ars sexualis  (holistic aspect of erotic and love), because that should be what matters.

Radically and unconsciously related to the first forces of life is wisdom waiting for us


https://www.pornhub.com/insights/2017-year-in-review
https://fightthenewdrug.org/pornhub-reports-most-viewed-porn-of-2017/

How (by the way original) conservatives think: let us construct our selves and consider with respect what is already there. 

How pseudo-revolutionares think: lets destroy the conservatives.

The only doubt a master still have is the doubt between a very

good and a excellent possibility

How to turn a false statement in a true one? 

Just divide it in many complicated parts and get a group to insanely repeat it infinite times.

For your parents is just one divorce, for you it feels like two never ending break-ups.

The biggest problem is still not the knowledge in order to build a pyramid, the problem is to really work and build again those pyramids, even if we had already the whole knowledge to do it, and to do it exclusively for sacred purposes.

Born from the womb , wisdom is grounded in everything what arises from it.

Humility is a virtue that leads you to wisdom and power; 
but only if you don’t submit to whom abuses of your virtue, 
and only if your humility does a commitment to a higher strenght. 

Was liegt in der (schlechten) klassischen Musik,  
dass den neuen cynischen Totalitariamus  so sehr verführt  ?

Gehörsamkeit, Disziplin, und Unempfindlichkeit.

If you are a fake professional, is possible that you are envy and want to destroy someone. So the best you can do to achieve this purpose is to lie with many plausible accusations as possible and mix them with some true statements. For noone want to verify it.

If you want to be fake, be a complex one. For noone want to verify it.

Self-manifestation and equilibrium. Everything the universe does is to expand its being while bringing the things in equilibrium.  If your will has something to do with that, your will is not only yours anymore.

One can recognize two types of discipline: one occurs by fear and conformity, the other by passion. In fact discipline is a concept of the will to wich we attend at those moments when passion is not there at work.

Shortcuts / Mediocrity

No matter if in battlefield or in the library, shortcuts are definitly the best way to mediocrity. What can you spect from so many university degrees  based in shortcuts, selling theirselves as "overviews" or "resumes", if not sophisticated mediocrity?

The practical meaning of overviews or resumes are always a upcoming task, but how often you settled to a overview or resume without upcoming tasks that are taken really  seriously?

Independence of outcome is one thing; using the "complexity (or relativity) of knowledge" for a masked establishment of mediocrity is another thing.

For the first time in history there is only pseudo high-culture in our education : no culture, and no high-culture either. 

How can you  respect a political position that permits to murder a baby ( just because he is “inside”) but discriminates openly who eat a stupid but sacred piece of chicken?!

As if one could after a rhetorical choreography incentivate whatever murder as a legal and standardized option!  Human babies are therefore going to have less dignity as a chicken.

Some musicians are gently and absolutely flawless and respectful with certain  music; some musicians fall deeply in love with the music they do, sometimes even without respect.

More than the beautiful  thing in itself, beautiful is the shared experience of this thing. 

If you cannot die for the music you make, you are giving birth to a child you still don’t love. 

It is still not easy to demonstrate the real cause of influence of the stars on us,  but it remains also  very hard to not be amazed with the analogies between macro- and microcosmos, source of every knowledge, meaning, and principally: poetry. 

And what do you want of the truth, if not meaning?

It is not a problem if someday you was a victim.What matters is how long you take the victim within you further.

Only as part of anything you can be something. But some people discovered anything else beyond being some thing.

Didactic

To teach means: allow to make conscient, therefore responsible, mistakes. And by “allowing” I mean: to set ficticious limits and create a proper emotional space.

 So you create a “game”. And everyone learned from playing games. The most basic game is imitation of things we like as a child. And the most hard is music, principally music imitating the games played by the universe.

(Music can be the hardest game because it is the game one creates and plays at the same time, while doing it.)

”Don’t Judge”

It is not about being not judgemental: it is about judging more the sin than the sinner.

Some people want free borders but are so attached to their „identities“ that they are killing the whole history of western ideas, reinterpretating then just for the advantage of a spirit of war, ugliness and rage.

Love and Atraction (Ontologically)

Attraction happens by opposition; love by similarity. 

      But each one, the opposition as much the similarity, can be accidental or substantial, and with or without each other.  And the qualities of the main types of relationships ( the familiar, the friendship, the erotical, and others) is ruled by this configuration. Furthermore, for some oppositions are obviously destructive or  simple doesn't cause attraction by its nature so its a certain kind of opposition what maters:

the opposition in therms of a complementation  

 the opposition in therms of a creative conflict, 

 the opposition in therms of a hierarchy

 the opposition in therms of gender

and so on.

  They appear in general as fullness and lack of something. So it is not enough the existence of difference; it is necessary that the difference manifest itself as a opposition, and that such opposition is related as fullness and emptyness of something in common, that is, something to share. 

  If some opposition is just intended as absolute appearance and empty expression, this "game" shows in fact a similarity between those who are related in the attraction, or it shows a complementation of the differences between then: that is the common play of lovers, to play as if, and so opposition and underlying similarity seems to increase at the same time. The attractive opposition is a opposition between appearances and sensitive manifestations: that is why it provoke emotions faster, although not always everlasting emotions. For the same reason a difference can be source of repulsion when felt as a certain and threatening opposition.

   In the other hand a similar quality can be also attractive, but its sensitive manifestation affects more the reason and judgement. So it matters for the attraction if the sensation of similarity is predominant of good or bad things, but namely in the sense that just one or other its seem. An attractive similarity is attractive if it shows the good qualities and hides the bad ones.

   

  However, the similarity, as a universal category for everything that exists, not a certain sensitive manifestation to the feeling, is more essential, because it sets a condition to think what is different, and so to re-think and judge what is opposed; not less evident it is some similarity by itself, taken beyond the reactions to feelings of attraction or repulsion, condition of love. Condition, but not cause yet: not because two things are similar in some aspect we can perceive then as related in love.  

   It is necessary that they recognise the whole shared similarity, not its short appearance to the sensibility "as only bad or only good", and accept (i.e. don't fear) the emotion parallel to this recognition (the love). Recognition is here not meant as a process of thought, although a spiritual act (a mental act). It is the "second cognition": the reflex over the felling.

   Recognition of the similar condition in a precedent universal similarity is then the cause of love, and love a kind of unmixed  gender of emotion above half-conscious feelings based on sensations. It requires a mind capable of conceiving a whole that goes beyond itself.  So you love the Creation, your cat, or even your cup of tea in the proportion of the similarity that you can recognise between you and then, but also in proportion to the similarity you both have with what is precedent and universal to you both.

  

          It is therefore not hard to see a important difference between love and attraction: 

         attraction happens at a subconscious level, but for love is required awareness.

 That is why love and hate are properly human/spiritual things, and animals are just attracted (or repulsed) to each other: they never love or hate.

          But their world are not so apart from ours at all: 

   It is a world constitued of causal reactions or indiference, where a value that connect such events is missing.

A good piece of music does self-analysis and expresses self-knowledge: it is a meaningful existence.

A very hard obviousness:

Before you acquire a certain thing in your life, you need to acquire it in your mind. 

A bad teacher teaches only his student; a good teacher teaches all the next generations.

When you realise that there is music for everything you understand that the world of music is far more interessant than the music of a certain world.

The Abstract God

1.

    It is a priceless gift that we have from the judish-christian Tradition: to set God as absolute pureness and so to establish the capacity to think it out of the world and so to think it abstractly.  However...what many catholics don't understand anymore is how to catch the meaning of God expressions in the nature. Events like a total eclipse of the sun at the day light, or virgo in full moon at the beginning of autumm does mean nothing to then...I asked the priest:

"Which Sunday is this on the liturgical calendar?" 

and he answered:

" Nothing special, is just the twenty-third Sunday" in ordinary time.  

   So why a "employed of God" speak about the Heaven quite every Sunday if the Sky passes absolutely meaningless to him by ?


 Something is missing there.

2.

God would be absurd if God would stay uncommunicated in itself. Only in its expression God is absolute. 

No instituted religion can extinguish the infinite interpretation of his expression. 

3.

No one is replaced by God without replacing oneself in the m o v i n g order of Creation.

The spiritual parameters of your placement are the parameters given by the meaningfulness of your concrete limits.

4.

 Only through limits you go beyond.

It doesn't matter if you had bad or good teachers: what you need are some very good lessons, for you get stronger against the infinity of bad ones. 

Its very important to pay attention on the fact that the “Big Bang” was such that: a) it creates life, b)it creates consciousness c) and the planets NEVER colide with each other,  for you can appreciate and recreate things in the glory for all that.

The neurotical vanguardist is a person who cannot relate past, present and future to each other; they cannot bring it togheter in a new symbol for an actual human experience of the same and eternal reality. 

Charity and Manipulation

If one is not asking for help, helping too much can be manipulation. 

That is why charity is something so rare: the person who cares for another person, another person out of its intimacy,  does it not only because one don't want nothing in change for that, it does also paying the price of being possibly perceived as a manipulator.

Devemos amar o próximo; mas é muito difícil amar o próximo demais.

Analysis without Synthesis

At every university you can find people doing analysis of something. And everywhere they are satisfied with the identification and never do the step of interpretation and comparation. Also many students don’t know about the theory behind such analysis and are confused , thinking that  the set of names and symbols employed there are already this theory.  In some cases it seems to me that is even for the master very hard to know what is behind a established analytical praxis because he forgot to ask where he came from. In such cases, asking the question is already the victory.

How good can be something so bad?

Musical Paradigm

Dear composer, I need to teach you that: a musical style is not a historical period! The negation of that is a simplification and serves just to a busy teacher of music history or composer who is neurotic with progress.

Music is the game of gods, and a musical style is a very special game, not a historical paradigm.  Like a game that a child don't want anymore to play, cultural paradigms can come back and even stronger. 

If nothing come back and different it would be impossible to open a new ("original") paradigm. 

Essentialy, there is only three principles on the background of this historical motion: affirmation (conservation), negation, and discovery.  One just need to embrace those three principles on the same creation. 

What is called revolution is often misunderstood in two manners: sometimes it means just negation, sometimes just discovery. But of course just negation and just discovery are a impossibility!

And just conservation is again a death: negation of life.

We  b e l o n g  to something better than ourselves. 

If hierarchy is a “construct”, or “ilusion”, what else could we espect from emancipation?

Social media is the new  and ultimate challenge for envy people.

Autoritär ist der Mensch, wenn er die Grenzen seiner Autorität nicht in Rücksicht nimmt, sie verlierend.

It is interessant how some truths are so deep that they make you lie, and that after you get used to lie you get distance from truth again.

Geistiges Wissen

Viele Leute shaffen geisteswissenschaftliches Wissen, noch mehr Leute reproduzieren dies Wissen, oft weil sie es einfach “mussen”;  wenige aber sind die, die geisteswissenschaftliches Wissen durch leben, d.h. verschiedenen Perspektive konrekt und einzeln zu testen ohne sich der Bequemheit oder Oportunismus nach aufhalten zu lassen. Es ist nähmlich ein Wissen dass nur Störung bringt und den Mut eines Selbst herausfördert: jedes geschriebenes Wort heisst langjähriges praktisches Leiden und Nachdenken; die Squizze, die man ins Feuer wirft, ist dabei kein Blattpapier, sondern du Selbst.

We have so much communication, but dialogue is rare. So this communication works against the freedom, as you fell so free to use it. Hence is not communication: is empty estimulation.

People believe that for many years women could not present thenselves as a sexual (I prefer to say « erotical ») being; nowadays men are those who cannot present theirselves as men at all, that means, even beyond acting as erotical beings. And everyone can see it, if one is not afraid from neglecting a whole world of utopic concepts without reality, the leftist world.

Meditation , Mindfullness

“Stop thinking too much” should not mean “stop reasoning”


There is something very true about the conceps of mind- aware- and now ( the ultimate novel) heartfullness. Nevertheless, the mainstream divulgation of such concepts confuses the idea of stop thinking  with stop reasoning .

 What  else  is the epokhé Husserls about? Its about “cleaning” the thoughts also, getting to a new level of consciousness. What for him was a fundamental act of consciousness did not mean that you stop reasoning, but that you improve the condition of your reasoning.  As much as the meditation practice,  Husserl speak about the consciousness as the core fundation of our primary intuition of the reality and the perceptions and interpretations related to it.

 If this new non-religious meditation mainstream doesn’t speak about reasoning and meditation togheter, then we can “just stop thinking”, take some old mystical drugs,  and celebrate our cultural decline right now.

Because a thing out of its predetermined order and context can be so harmful as the Sun trying to move like the  Moon.

To love a dominant man does not mean being dominated. To love a pleasant woman does not mean being abusive.

Justice, Group and Essence

                Justice, as the things of love, are always specific, and related to one essence. If you want justice for a whole group as such you are doing in fact injustice against some individual out of this group. Because as a group you will not have limits to define how damaged is the victim. That is worse if we speak about a ideology, that means, something that goes in time and space autonomously beyond the group. 

 As human beings we can perceive and isolate a element from one or more different and even paradoxically opposed sets in order to integrate the essence of this element in ours. If you educate someone with classical art , for example, this person will get always more sensible to what is the essence of something, but at the same time to how its essence is related to general values.  Condition for doing justice is only a matter of relating feelings to a especifical reality in order to transform feelings of fear in feelings of love.  

 As an animal we would remain only in a vague collective and automatic way of behaviour, but as human beings we go beyond that: we relate our conscience to isolated elements, as much as to groups of elements at the same time. 

 What should then that mean, to identify a group with a sexual gender? And what should that mean, to identify a group with a sexual felling? If you cannot define all the victims of a group so you victimise every person of this group. And if you victimise just the ideas of this group, how can you confuse that with victimising the arguers of such ideas?

 For doing justice its enough concepts of justice, you don't need the concepts of the victim-group; in the same sense you don't need to base it on the "agressor-group" as well.   But the point is: a small group of human beings cannot damm the whole human species and its tradition as an aggressor! Because in this way you would accuse a whole group (much more complex) again, what can be harmful for one possible individual of this group:

 so again you are coming from general ideas that can neglect the perception of a specific situation for this individual, because those ideas of the victim-group are based on feelings of fear.  The ideas of the accused group, however, was based in feelings of love. 

 Basically we are comparing wrong actions taken from feelings of fear versus actions taken from fears of love. Bad actions are always bad, but a bad action based on wrong intention is a positive evil, while a bad action based on good intention is a negative evil. 

The first is injustice in progress; the second is a reparable injustice.

 The higher the pleasure is, the more it can be vicious for someone wo suffers deep pain. 

As much as you don’t give up, the more your  enemies  invest against you so the more your friends can invest for you.

Exactly because love brings life at its deepest intensity, a break up can be the most painful experience of death.

Limits

Without knowing the limits of what you want to know you will never know it at all; and the fear of what it could be, but you never checked out, can torment and possess you.  Behind this fear are your true desires pointing to something  beyond the limits, even as something that never can happen. The fear points to a death that we experience at the edge of the limit; the true will behind those desires,however, goes beyond the limit, expand it, because it is the spirit of life itself. The will can set limits for someone because it can go far beyond them as well.  On the same way, your will dies if the limit appear as too threatening , or if the limit is totally unknown. In one case your energy dies by pressure, in the other case it dies by lost of pressure.

Only a stupid society like ours ( a society without roots) need to give more money for ephemeral solutions against suicide ( superficial entertainment is one of them) than for its prevention by reinforcing what distinct us as human beings (not as chimps!): this distinction means namely when society lives like a pyramid for the actual and spiritual transcendence of its individuals in THIS life, not as a desgusting nihilistic labyrinth of fear from oneself and goodly masked cowardice.

If you think that you are your personal history it will be hard to change your personal history. Because every human being is in fact transcendent being; not the things that happen, but what relate the happenings meaningfully to each other or not.

For some people the ultimate meaning is to live for few limited  goods that life gives to them; for some other people the ultimate meaning is to live for that what gives them the life and its unlimited  goods.

Being alone is a constant dialogue between being free and being lonely.

There is two important and opposite ways to understand nihilism: in one hand reality is conceived without any meaning but in a very neutral sense, in other hand reality is conceived as having a intrinsic negative meaning: thats the pessimist and anarchist type of nihilism. The first type of nihilism has still a coherence with the idea of creation of meaning.

I believe that you can really work 8 hours  for one day ; but I dare you to really do nothing for 8 hours and in just  one day of your life...

Sometimes you are ruled by what you need; sometimes you rule what you want, because you don’t need it. 

AS THE MOST BASIC KNOWLEDGE, ONLY FAITH TEACHES THE TRUE FIDELITY.

Poucas coisas requerem tantas virtudes para serem suportadas como a virtude da inteligência.

What can be more courageous than a immortal soul?

The best weapon stupid people can have against intelligent people  is to envolve them in their confusion;if they cannot use the physical violence they use the intellectual one.

People don’t know nothing about ANY GOOD meaning for the adjective “conservative “ that is out of a leftist-marxist interpretation.  

A philosopher don’t espect to be always right and you always wrong about fundamental things; he is just shure that he is normally right and you normally wrong when you both talk about these things.Ideally, he will not so easy understimate what he doesn’t know, while you certainly are overestimating what you know.

On “Be Yourself”

People like to speak about “self-knowledge” and about being “ yourself “. But its not easy to find who understand that being authentic without self-knowledge is the source of alienation and dependence.

The two most important conditions of self-knowledge is knowledge and courage. Courage can be taken from faith,its the key fundament before getting to know something; and knowledge means the heritage of classical teaches:philosophy, art, religion.

If your self-knowledge is based in wrong theories, sponsored by injust politics, what would you espect to be, while trying to “be your self”?

In Europe sadness is not allowed, just its radical state after there is no way back to sanity: histery, depression, panic. Just sickness have a protected social identity.

The most dangerous thing you can do is being yourself: no one know what it is.

The experience of  a break-up means that the loved person is dead, and in such a way that this death is still every day much more  alive than yourself. 

What is the value of happiness without freedom? One need to jump into the dark uncertainty of freedom and espect to get happy from that point ahead.So the difference between coward and courageous happiness.

How accurate is your idea of the middle if you don’t have any experience of its extremes?

The moral middle therm is not enough: you beginn to search for the middle of the middle. And there you go extrem again.

A bad musician believes that the poetic and creative process ends by the composer himself; a bad composer thinks the same about his pieces.

Some people who do not get what they want can believe that they are not « manipulators » just because they did not get what they want. Because if you do not get what you want is easier to hidde what you in fact was looking for and reinterpretate the past of your acions. 

The people who get something exactly as they want are those who will always suffer from this suspectious ambiguity: “how did they come there just with a good moral?!”

The most important element of the romance ( a genuine abscence and impossibility of contact, what means a natural tension, not the artificial tension of the game) is gone.

Some people take the others as a choice, but espect to be their priority; some people accept to be a choice and care about the others as a priority. 

If you are used to tell some secrets you will be surprised by similar secrets that some people will open  to you,

The best metaphysicians were the best lovers; 
the best lovers are the best metaphysicians.

Fear is the felling frequently related to something that does not exists.
Courage is the felling that brings something to its proper existence.

If your ideal is to become normal, you will soon be substituted soon.

The virtue of our time: to grow up weak for the affirmation of love and to take the biggest profit of our own cowardice, to throw away the universal deepness of soul and its everlasting works right out of its trembling surface.

Looser/Winner

A looser is more looser when he loses himself while loosing; otherwise he wins something he will never loose again. All the games are inner games.

O que está fazendo essa gente, querendo transbordar autoridade e conhecimento em suas explicações sem antes tentarem tornar-se pessoas mais compreensivas? É preciso ligar os receptores e ativá-los à 360 graus.